Vote
Dick Carpani for Mayor |
Council should censure mayorSarnia
city council members were wise to
send off a warning to the mayor this week, but in order to have any
kind of
.impact, they must follow through and censure him from closed door
meetings for
a reasonable period. The
issue became public at Mondays council
meeting when the mayor read a brief statement and stormed out of the
council
chambers. He is being accused by council of leaking information from an
in-
camera meeting to an area media outlet. Council wants to meet privately
with
him and vote on censuring him from in-camera meetings for a designated
period
of time. It’s
a reasonable response to
irresponsible actions by the mayor. The
issue which was discussed in- camera
deals with the city's settlement in the Clearwater land deals. The
mayor has
accused council of agreeing to a bad deal and then trying to gag him
for
speaking out about it. Details of the agreement are expected to be made
public
within two weeks. Good,
bad or ugly, no agreements reached
in-camera should be revealed publicly before both sides have signed
off. Such
actions could potentially compromise city business. If
the mayor has contravened the city's
policy regarding confidentiality of information gathered from an
in-camera
meeting, then councillors must act swiftly in order to protect the
city's
intests. It
appears the mayor has ignored all
important city policy under the guise of being on a mission of public
awareness. This has been done so he could criticize an agreement he
does not
support. Regardless of his political motives, his actions were wrong.
The issue
before council now is one of procedures and policy, not political
standpoints. His
comments to The Observer that- as
chair of council, he has the right to release any in-camera information
at any
time, smacks of a politician who is on a self-serving power trip. (Editorial
The Observer 2002-09 15) |
||||
|
||||
Date This Page Was Last Up-Dated: October 08, 2006 |