Vote
Dick Carpani for Mayor |
City council broke its own rules of procedureSir:This letter
is to report on the strange actions of council and the mayor at
Monday’s
(March 21, 2005) Sarnia City Council Meeting. The action was
on
Agenda Item 3 in the correspondence section of the meeting. The motion
was to
approve a leasing agreement. When the vote was called the motion failed
and
Mayor Bradley declared it failed. The mayor became upset that it had
failed and
he and other councillors continued discussion on the already passed
motion. After
discussion the mayor declared a second vote. This time the motion
passed. Why do I report
this as unusual? These actions broke the normal rules of meetings, and
in
particular broke council’s own rules of procedure:
The council
flip-flopped on the issue. It will be
interesting to see how this part of the meeting is reported in the
minutes.
They will have to show that the same motion both passed and failed at
the same
meeting. What should have
happened? Some councillor, especially one who voted against the motion,
should
have made a “point of order” to help the mayor understand that he was
making a
procedural error. Then there could have been a motion of
reconsideration that,
if passed, would have allowed the meeting to proceed to discuss and
reverse the
previous motion. Why does it
matter? The mayor has again shown that he is able to bully the council
into
getting his way, in this case even after a decision had been made. Do you think that
the mayor just made a slip? The mayor has many years of experience
(some would
say too many). So, you would think Mayor Bradley was a rookie who did
not know
the rules, or more likely, as he did not like the outcome and knew he
had an
inexperienced council. He knew he could get away with having his own
way.
Bradley has bullied councils many times before, but usually his methods
are
only suspicious, not prohibited. Sincerely, (Letter to the Editor The Observer 2005 03 24) |
||||
|
||||
Date This Page Was Last Up-Dated: October 08, 2006 |